To your odds of kissing on address, there’s a serious communication ranging from grandiose narcissism and you may new member sex, ? = .161, t = dos.819, p = .005. It interaction is actually displayed during the Fig 2. The straightforward slopes for men (effortless slope = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and you may women (easy slope = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) just weren’t tall. Grandiose narcissists didn’t display an increased probability of kissing having a connected target more just one (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), recommending one grandiose narcissism wasn’t of this companion poaching to own a primary-identity fling.

Grandiose narcissists will report spouse poaching -particularly for the fresh new short-term . not, a question stays as solteros sobrios to if they discover members of relationship a lot more worth searching for than folks who are solitary. Widman and you can McNulty reason that grandiose narcissistic inclinations would-be activated across points normally (such as the thinking-declaration off existence frequency of sexual choices), although not end up being activated whenever placed in a specific problem. Hence, it will be possible you to definitely grandiose narcissists divulge a reputation interesting when you look at the mate poaching, but never always select those in relationships to get best mates. I tested that it possibility in five degree.

Mate poaching inventory.

For very long-identity spouse poaching, grandiose narcissism try a significant predictor for women (? = .306, t = dos.623, p = .010) and you may a marginally extreme predictor for males (? = .218, t = step one.725, p = .088). None of the Larger Four details was in fact extreme. Grandiose narcissism was not a serious predictor regarding victory from the poaching towards the enough time-name for males (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), but it is for women (? = .340, t = 2.369, p = .021). Nothing of one’s other variables was basically tall with the exception of ladies neuroticism; when lady have been a great deal more neurotic, it claimed much more profits in the poaching for a long-name intimate relationship.

Show

Interesting, grandiose narcissism was not for the spouse poaching certainly guys. This result is in line with abilities reported by Kardum and you will acquaintances . Ergo, it will be possible you to definitely grandiose narcissistic ladies are more often guilty away from partner poaching.

Materials and you will procedure

There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.