One of the standard society out of kids, teenagers whom sext will be sexually energetic ; on the other hand, this has been seen these teenagers have shorter understanding of its ideas and more challenge managing her or him .
Hence, it would be fascinating to investigate the latest defensive strategy utilized by kids and you may young people. In particular, it will be advantageous to take notice of the defensive procedures used by adolescents about the impaired use of the innovation with be created in the past few years and are usually today a part of daily life. Also, as sexting are an elaborate occurrence, the latest books would be to analysis whether the accessibility this type of choices are of this specific defensive methods or behavioural/mental trouble.
2.1. Professionals and you can Techniques
The fresh sample of the establish study contains Letter = 209 victims having N = 132 lady (63%) and Letter = 77 people (37%); the latest sample decades ranged out-of 14 in order to twenty five years (M =18.8; SD = step 3.55). I chose to use this age groups consistent with the definition regarding “the new adolescence” formulated by the Sawyer and you may associates . Most of the sufferers filled out an internet randomized survey because of Google Forms immediately following understanding and you can acknowledging told agree facts; regarding minors, mom and dad was in fact permitted to engage. No personal data is questioned regarding the data, and you can anonymity and you may privacy was in fact guaranteed.
2.dos.1. Socio-Group Details
Age, sex and you may sexual direction had been asked out-of players. Sex are coded because the an effective dummy adjustable (women = 0; men = 1). Intimate positioning in it the following choice: heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, asexual or any other.
dos.2.dos. Sexting Conclusion Survey (SBQ)
To evaluate sexting routines, the Sexting Choices Survey was utilized, which is an altered type of new Sexting Behavior Measure . That it survey contains 31 points and you can talks about sexting behavior in three sandwich-dimensions: acquiring, giving and you may upload sexts to the social media specifying who’s the fresh new subject of the sexts and you can if sexts were sent or published with their consent. Within product, sexting habits are identified as “sending otherwise researching sexually effective or provocative messages/photos/clips thru cellphone and you will/otherwise Facebook or other Internet sites social networking webpages” and you can professionals was indeed assigned a rating every single item from one in order to 5 (step one = never; 2 = hardly or once or twice; step three = occasionally; cuatro = often; 5 = appear to otherwise each day). In the present research, this scale demonstrated a inner structure, having good Cronbach ? value of 0.87.
2.dos.step three. Sexting Reasons Survey (SMQ)
The Sexting Reasons Survey was applied determine the three reasons getting giving sexts. It’s an effective 13-item worry about-declaration level towards the a great 5-area Likert-sorts of measure out of 0 (never) to cuatro (always). This tool tips the latest regularity out-of about three sexting motives: “intimate intentions” means sending sexts to own intimate tries plus it includes five points. A sample items is: “Possibly I upload sexts to possess teasing or connecting”; “instrumental/angry aim” is the usage of sexting to own additional tries, not related to sexuality, eg sharing sexts in exchange for anything, under pressure/coercion or which have unsafe intentions also it include five items. An example items is actually: “Often We publish sexts in order to harm or destroy anyone”). The final desire was “human anatomy photo support” and that is applicable whenever revealing sexts so you can get confident viewpoints regarding the very own muscles also it includes around three situations. A sample goods is: “Often I publish sexts to check if or not I’m attractive enough”. This device presented a great psychometric characteristics: Cronbach’s ? gotten hur man hittar vackra Amerikansk-kvinnor fГ¶r Г¤ktenskap try ? = 0.86.