1. Yet ,, from inside the family history, everyone knowthat for every laws there is a different. An excellent vexing section ofgenealogy would be the fact no body very understands how to make use of new exclusions orrules having any definitive adjective instance usually, maybe, most likely,almost certainly, an such like. It could be fascinating in the event the indeed there most other examples ofjointures getting generated a year otherwise a couple shortly after a well-known relationships date.

dos. Is there a keen extant dispensation to your wedding from ElizabethClifford and you may Sir Ralph Bowes who were third cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or fourth cousins, after taken off the new fifth LordClifford? Who narrow down its wedding date.

Arthur

Presumably, when the good dispensation is actually found and granted, it could havebeen by the one of several pursuing the, and may even can be found in the fresh correspondingregister guide, when it survives:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop off York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop away from Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop off York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop away from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop away from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop out-of Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop off Carlisle 1509-1520

5. In the event the tenth Lord Clifford do marry in early 1487 [state January] andhas Elizabeth afterwards where 12 months, do this new chronology perhaps not work?

John palms?

Elizabeth born when you look at the later 1487, Henry created inside 1488/9, Joan in the ,etc. completing the latest brands of upload regarding . When the (a) thechronology nonetheless performs; and you may (b) their marriage piece was not reasonable; thenwe simply have the brand new 1505 pedigree out of Henry VII’s which is when you look at the oppositionto the newest supposition one she is actually a legitimate daughter.

6. Regarding the 1505 pedigree: May be the Clifford daughters the fresh onlyknown Henry VII relations excluded? Are there anybody else? Therefore,won’t you to mirror improperly on this document because the a source?

Regarding comparisons We have made of the fresh new c.1505 Henry VII Relationships pedigreeswith the new 1480-1500 Visitation of the Northern pedigrees, being

On the c.1505 Affairs pedigrees, this new Clifford youngsters are not listedin a good Clifford pedigree, but rather regarding St. John pedigree. Once the I’mnot always the newest St. John loved ones, following the ‘s the guidance asit seems on the c.1505 pedigree, given that obtained from the fresh 1834 Coll. Ideal. etGen. blog post. The new phrasing into the quotations is strictly as it looks inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).

“Zero. XII.”Away from my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out-of Somerset had three husbands.” Of the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My Lady the new King’s Mother.” who’d “The fresh new Queen.” whohad “Prince “Because of the “Sir Oliver Saint John, first spouse.” she got step 3 daus & dos sons:

A good. “Edith, married so you can Geoffrey Pole regarding Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. wedded with the Lady Margaret, dau. off theDuke regarding Clarence.” They’d: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married in order to Ralph Verney, Esq.” They’d: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[yet another youngster, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He previously four students:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight Imajte pogled na web stranicu.” who’d “Four daughters and you may oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you can Harry Lord Clifford.” They’d “Jane. Mabill.Henry, child and heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Age, married to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. off Lincolnshire.”B4. “An effective Nun out-of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, married in order to Sir Richard Frognall.” They had:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his brethren and you can sistren.” Having issueindicated, however entitled.C2. “Age, married in order to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “Elizabeth, married very first toward Lord Zouche; once with the LordScrope regarding Bolton.” Issue:D1. [from the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [from the Scrope] ” Conyers.” That have issueindicated but not named.

Margaret Duchess from Somerset, by the “Lionel Lord Welles, history spouse.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. from K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Elizabeth.”